The Language exposes the Deception

In the previous article, we saw that Muhammad had taken “ONE OF(ʾaḥad) THE TRIBAL GODS” by name Allah and redefined him to look like the God of the Universe that is worshipped by the Christians and the Jews. He forced his followers to think that Allah is now the new god after the “new baptism” given by Muhammad. But the Islamic Dilemma does not leave the Muslims. The Quránic language is riddled with problems. The SINGULAR ALLAH, sometimes speak in Plural and some other times, speak in the singular. The Jugglery of Muhammad with the wordings is clearly exposed.

This passage is from Sura 17:1. Muslims generally consider that the Qurán is the direct word from Allah’s own mouth. Let us analyse the statement.

Glory be to HIM Who took His servant by night from the Holy Mosque to the Further Mosque

Sura 17:1a

If Allah is speaking this verse, we see a Narcissistic Megalomaniac Allah. He is self-exalting himself. Such a character is unlike the God of the Bible, where the People and the Angels praise him. for eg, Psalm 148. Clearly, the Allah of the Qurán and the God of the Bible are totally different beings. Allah addresses himself in the Singular here. He addresses himself as “HIM“. Let’s go to the next portion of the same verse.

the precincts of which WE have blessed that WE might show him OUR Signs.

Sura 17:1b

Suddenly this Singular Allah is changing himself to a Plural Group. Immediately the “HE” becomes a “WE”. Remember that this dual nature of Allah is exposed in the VERY SAME SENTENCE. The twist continues to the last sentence of this same verse.

HE is the All-hearing and the All-seeing

Sura 17:1c

Unless the “HE” here is Muhammad, we see this Allah, changes back to the Singular. If the Muslims argue that the “HE” in this sentence is Muhammad, then they have a bigger theological problem than the Schizophrenic Allah who keeps swinging between his singularity and plurality.

Why is Allah behaving like this? Is it not Muhammad himself wearing the mask of Allah and prophesying in his name?

How do we reconcile this problem?

Is not this one main reason Muslims tell others to read the Quran in Arabic, knowing very well that they cannot read it?

Is it the Royal WE or Schizophrenia?

There is no end to this Islamic Dilemma. The more Muslims want to cover up for their Muhammad and his puppet Allah, the more their trousers tear off. There seems to be no end.

What is the Royal “WE”?

Let us check some definitions.

The royal we is commonly employed by a person of high office, such as a monarch or other type of sovereign. It is also used in certain formal contexts by bishops and university rectors. William Longchamp is credited with its introduction to England in the late 12th century, following the practice of the Chancery of Apostolic Briefs.

Wikipedia

The royal “we” is also referred to as the majestic plural or pluralis majestatis, in Latin. Despite its name, the royal “we” has been used by people other than royalty, though it is most often associated with kings and queens. This strange grammatical construct has its roots in the 1100s. We will examine the meaning of the personal pronoun, the royal “we”, who first used the expression in the English language, and some examples of that use in sentences.

The Grammatist

The Inference of the above definitions is simple.

Royal “WE” is used by HUMANS who hold high offices

Wikipedia and Grammatist

Indeed this punctures the whole of Islamic Excuse. Royal “WE” is used for HUMANS and NOT for the DIVINE BEING.

The Purpose of the Royal “WE”

Let us see the usages and the reason for such usages. Monarchs used the term WE for themselves in matters which were of concern for their kingdom. They used the term “WE” to manipulate any opposition to their decisions and signify a stamp of DIVINE APPROVAL.

For example, in his manifesto confirming the abdication of Grand Duke Constantine Pavlovich, Emperor Alexander I begins:

“By the Grace of God, We, Alexander I, Emperor and Autocrat of All the Russias ….”

Emperor Alexander I

Notice how he is stamping a note of Divine Approval to his decision. So the assumed (HE + GOD) becomes the WE. That is how the Royal WE came into Existence.

How did Allah get it Wrong?

When an illiterate Arabian caravan robber wanted to act as the messenger of God, he is bound to make such mistakes. The Imaginary Allah was trying to act as if he is all-hearing and all-seeing. This is the point when I agree with most Muslims that he was uneducated and illiterate. But remaining uneducated and trying to justify unreasonable things, is just a poor excuse. It just adds to the Islamic Dilemma.

Had Muhammad been using the term “We”, it could mean that he was using the approval of Allah to dictate things. However, when Allah himself quotes the term “WE“, It comes from the conscience of a tribal god of the Polytheist Quereshi tribe. This conscience plays in Muhammad’s mind always. When it gets intense, he even blurts out SATANIC VERSES as we see in Sura 53(An Najm). Then later on when he realises that it has deviated from this make-believe Allah, he had to blame it on Satan for that. Is it Royal WE or Schizophrenia?

Conclusion

Dear Muslim friends, why are you perspiring and trying to explain away the obvious? Truly the Dilemma is immense. The “WE” and the frequent switching between the plural and singular is a clear indication of a confused mind. It is NOT the Royal WE. Why do we need to hide the miserable failure of the Royal We in this case? Unless you get neutral and try to critically analyse the situation, the Royal We will continue to be a problem.

End of “The Miserable failure of the Royal WE concoction 3“

Allah from the pages of history books

Muslims always tell us that Allah is the generic name of God, in Arabic. But in reality, is that so? Let us turn to the pages of history and investigate from their own books.

The Qureishis has a pantheon of gods and goddesses. Allah was one of the tribal gods in the pantheon. Muhammad belonged to this tribe. The gods in the pantheon are as follows

Pre-Islamic Gods of Arabia

‘Amm. A’ra. Abgal. Allah. Al-Lat. Al-Qaum. Almaqah. Anbay. Atarsamain. Athtar. Basamum. Dhu l-Khalasa. Dushara. Haukim. Hubal. Isāf and Nā’ila. Manaf. Al-Manāt. Nasr. Nuha. Quzah. Ruda. Sa’d. Shams, Samas. Syn. Suwa’. Ta’lab. Theandriosal-‘. Al-Uzzá. Wadd. Ya’uq. Yaghūth. Yatha

Allah had three daughters(Al-Lat, Manāt, Uzzá) according to the Qureishi beliefs(Sura 53:19-20). What Muhammad did was to take this tribal god and impersonate him as the same God as worshipped by the Jews and Christians. He, therefore, removed the three daughters from the Hybrid Allah and took some features from the belief of Jews and Christians to define the new Allah. Interestingly, the Qurán itself gives clues to that.

In the process of denying that it is the very same tribal god Allah of the Quraish people, the Qur’an prompts Muhammad to ask why do they attribute daughters to Allah. Clearly, Muhammad and the Quraish people were in disagreement with certain features of the same tribal god Allah. Muhammad wanted to elevate the Arabian tribal god as the God of the Universe.

Ask them ˹O Prophet˺ if your Lord has daughters,¹ while the pagans ˹prefer to˺ have sons.

Sura 37:149

According to the Qureishi beliefs, this Allah had a marital relationship with the Jinn families. Now Muhammad is trying to delink all those age-old beliefs of the Qureishi Tribal people. The controversy continues in different places within the Quran itself.

They have also established a ˹marital˺ relationship between Him and the jinn. Yet the jinn ˹themselves˺ know well that such people will certainly be brought ˹for punishment˺.¹

Sura 37:158

Scriptures like these are clear proofs that Allah was a Deity of the Qureishi tribesman. Muhammad had to literally hijack Allah from them. He and his Allah had to do lots of arguing and seducing to elevate him above the cube of Kaaba.

In fact, the Qureishi people were amused by the antics of Muhammad and they just ignored his nonsense.

“The unbelievers said, ‘Has he made all that is to be worshipped a single God, who alone is to be called upon and hears all invocations. This is a very curious thing which we have not heard of.’ So the leaders amongst them went off saying to one another, ‘Continue in what you are upon and persist in worshipping your idols. He only says this to gain ascendancy over us.’”

Sura 38:5-6

The Loose end

Even though Muhammad kept saying that Allah is an absolute one, his so-called Allah got exposed in Sura 112(Al-Ikhlas). The translators did masking up to cover up the scam.

قُل هُوَ اللَّهُ أَحَدٌ

Sura 112:1

The Transliteration in English is qul huwa llāhu ʾaḥad

The literal translation of the verse is “Say, ‘He Allah is One of [the people]”

The word aḥad is clearly “ONE OF” as in “One of Many” indicating that he is one of the many tribal gods of the Qureishi tribe. Had he been THE ABSOLUTE ONE, they would have used the word Al-Wahid. If you go back and check the translations of Qurán you will see that these dishonest translators have made the “ONE OF” as “ONE” so that the edifice of the ABSOLUTE ONE is preserved.

Unfortunately for them, the Lies of the translators would not sync up. They forgot to massage the same word and cover up in Sura 4:43 where the word is ʾaḥad in أَوْ جَاءَ أَحَدٌ مِّنكُم. It means “ONE OF” according to their own translation. How come these double standards? If they were honest, shouldn’t aḥad mean an ABSOLUTE ONE as in Sura 112:1? Here أَوْ جَاءَ أَحَدٌ مِّنكُم is rendered correctly as: Or if “ONE OF“ (not one) you came. Clearly, they are dishonest in their ways where they acknowledge the word’s true meaning in Sura 4:43 but twist in Sura 112:1.

Unfortunately, for Muslims, the next verse does more damage.

اللَّهُ الصَّمَدُ

Sura 112:2

The Transliteration in English is ^allāhu ṣ-ṣamad

The literal translation of the verse is Allahu as-Samad

The Translators have invented words for Samad to cover up the botched work. They give made-up meanings like “Eternal”. “Sustaining”, “All-Embracing” and whatever they like fits the pie. However, Ibn Kathir, their scholar says that Samad and Samud are names of Idols. He says that the Kaafirs of the Quraish worship the Idols. One is Samad and the others are Samud and Al-hibah.

So knowing this mystery, we can translate Sura 112:1-2 as follows

Say Allah is One of the Other Idols

Ibn Kathir (by explanation)

Most translations of the Qur’an by Tablighees, Indian Muslims and Pakistanis are dishonest.

The Shahada Expose

Shahada is an Islamic confession in which Muslims accept the Deity of Allah and the Prophethood of Muhammad. The Wordings of the Shahada are mentioned below.

Notice the wordings. It says there is no god but Allah. If the word Allah meant God in a generic form, the confession should have been “lā ā llāhʾillā llāhu“.The Shahada exposes the Islamic lie that Allah is the generic name for God in Arabic. In reality, the generic name of God in Arabic is ʾilāha.

Without any doubt, the Allah of Islam is an import from the Qureishi tribe. Muhammad circumcised away the undesirable part and created a new definition for the Qureishi god, Allah(One of the Pre-Islamic Gods of Arabia).

Why Christian bibles use the word, Allah?

In the pre-Islamic era, Christian references to God in Arabic was always ʾilāha. Many Christian tombstones discovered in the Arabian peninsula uses the Arabic word ʾilāha. as a reference to God. However, after the domination of Islam, during the ottoman empire, the Christians in those land used the word Al + ʾilāha (The God) = Allah as a merged word in a generic form. However, the Arabic bible still Quotes the Name of God in Exodus 3:15 as YHWH/Jehovah.

وَقَالَ أيْضًا لِمُوسَى: «قُلْ لِبَنِي إسْرَائِيلَ: ‹يهوه^[d] إلَهُ آبَائِكُمْ، إلَهُ إبْرَاهِيمَ وَإلَهُ إسحَاقَ وَإلَهُ يَعْقُوبَ أرْسَلَنِي إلَيكُمْ. هَذَا اسْمِي إلَى الأبَدِ، وَلَقَبِي فِي كُلِّ جِيلٍ.›»

Exodus 3:15

“Educated Muslim” is of the view, that the Arabic Bible have to be re-translated to make known that we have no connection with the imposter Allah of Islam. All references to Allah need to be re-worded as ʾilāha.

Conclusion

Dear Muslims, How long will you continue to live a lie? The god that was introduced to you was the tribal god Allah and not the God of the Bible. Gullible Muslims are led astray by Muhammad. No amount of refining your god will make him the God of the Bible. Allah is an imposter. Realise your folly and follow the Only True God – YHWH.

End of “Seductive impersonation by Allah leads Muslims Astray 2“

If the Name itself does not match with the Name of the God of the Bible, why do we need to listen to any reasoning about the Islamic Allah is the God of the Bible? Islam is Clueless about the Authoritative Personal Name of God. Notice the picture below. The KNOCK-OFF of Kit Kat is being sold in a similar-looking pack.

Would you buy Kat Kot knowing that it is a cheap Knock-off

Let us examine the pack that is presented here.

• Introducing to you Kat Kot
• It looks exactly like the Kit-Kat (The original Product)
• The packing and the color of the pack is like the same original product.
• The Slogan also is almost the same.
• They advertise it as a crispy tasty product.
• It costs you just half of the price of the original product.

With all the above highlights, Would you buy this product and give it to your kids? Let us listen to a conversation in a neighbourhood store.

Christopher and his son Benedict goes to the neighbourhood store. The name of the store is “Muhammad’s dollar store“. Christopher wanted to buy some toys for Benedict so that he can spend his weekend vacation. After getting the toys, dad and son are standing at the checkout counter to make the payment. Looking at the red Kat Kot boxes displayed near the counter, little Benedict prompts his dad to get him one of those packs. Christopher after staring at it for some time enquires with the counter staff Ameena.

Christopher – Ma’am, this looks almost like Kit-Kat. Is this a New Product?

Ameena – Yes this is from the same Kit Kat Family. It is a better product than Kit Kat.

Christopher – Oh is that so? From the looks, it seems to be a knock-off.

Ameena – Oh no, Kit-Kat is the old product. We detected some quality issues with it. Hence we started getting Kat Kot. It’s an excellent chocolate-covered wafer bar. This new pack ensures complete preservation, unlike Kit-kat. It’s indestructible. Moreover, it is from the same factory. bla.bla..bla..

Christopher paid the cash and walked off from the store without buying the Kat Kot from Muhammad’s Dollar Store. Just as Ameena, the store clerk, Islam is clueless regarding the basics. They tell us that Islam is from the same God, but the name itself is susipcious.

Detect the Knock-off and stay away from Cheap Imitations

If a normal father will deny his son the pleasure of the Kat-Kot confectionery because it can be harmful to him, why would you want to experiment with something which is more dangerous than some bad food? Islam is evil from the very perception. Islam is clueless regarding the name of God. Every time we ask our Muslim friends about the name of their God, they reply ALLAH.

They are in a Dilemma because if they say that Allah is the personal name of God, they themselves are confirming that Allah is not YAHWEH, the God we see in the Bible. But if they say that ALLAH is a Generic Arabic Name to identify the Supreme Being, they still need to tell us his Proper Name.

The Name of God according to the Bible

When Moses had an encounter with God in the burning bush, he asked God, what was his name. I am quoting that incident from the book of exodus.

¹³ Moses said to God, “Suppose I go to the Israelites and say to them, ‘The God of your fathers has sent me to you,’ and they ask me, ‘What is his name?’ Then what shall I tell them?”

¹⁴ God said to Moses, “I AM WHO I AM.(אֶהְיֶה אֲשֶׁר אֶהְיֶה‎, ’ehyeh ’ăšer ’ehyeh)^[a] This is what you are to say to the Israelites: ‘I AM(אֶהְיֶה , ’ehyeh ’)  has sent me to you.’”

¹⁵ God also said to Moses, “Say to the Israelites, ‘אֶהְיֶה , ’ehyeh ’,^[b] the God of your fathers—the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac and the God of Jacob—has sent me to you.’

“THIS IS MY NAME FOREVER,
    THE NAME YOU SHALL CALL ME
    FROM GENERATION TO GENERATION.

Exo 3:13-15

Therefore, Ehyeh(אֶהְיֶה) /I AM is the Divine Self-address when God identifies Himself using His Personal name Ehyeh(אֶהְיֶה)/I AM.

The Tetragrammaton

Conclusion

The Islamic Dilemma does not end here. The cheap imitation called Allah did not even know the history of the Jews and Christians even though he claims to be the same God. He messes up his understanding of the Christian and Jewish texts. Islam is clueless when it comes to the Christian concept of God. More of that in the next article of the series.

End of “Islam Clueless about the Authoritative Personal Name of God 1“

Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits, whether they are of God; because many false prophets have gone out into the world. 2 By this you know the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is of God, 3 and every spirit that does not confess [a]that Jesus [b]Christ has come in the flesh is not of God. And this is the spirit of the Antichrist, which you have heard was coming and is now already in the world.

1 John 4:1-3

Taking out the most important portion of the above scripture, let me reiterate.

Every spirit that does NOT confess that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is NOT of God

Before mentioning the above, John clearly said that such doctrines are produced by FALSE PROPHETS.

What does it mean by “COME IN THE FLESH”?

In simple terms, GOD, THE SON, Came in Human Form(Flesh) from a Form that was Not at all Human. This process is termed INCARNATION. He took the Human Form and Came in. In the narration of Christmas, every Christian is Celebrating the entry of God into Humanity. It is not like celebrating the Birthday of some important person.

Paul the Apostle, summarises the Incarnation and the Ministry of Jesus in his epistle to the Philippians.

⁶ Who, BEING IN THE FORM OF GOD, thought it not robbery to be equal with God: ⁷ But made himself of no reputation, and TOOK UPON HIM THE FORM OF A SERVANT, and was MADE IN THE LIKENESS OF MEN: ⁸ And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross. 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him and given him a name which is above every name: ¹⁰ That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth; ¹¹ And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Phil 2:6-11

In another passage, he quotes the same event in a nutshell

And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: GOD WAS MANIFEST IN THE FLESH, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory.

1 Tim 3:16

The Ultimate Insult to Jesus by denying his Divinity

Most of the questions by Muslims with regards to Christ are arising out of their evil satanic nature to blaspheme God the Son. They somehow want to elevate their False Prophet above Jesus Christ the Incarnate God. Therefore, the evil spirit causes them to blaspheme. Jesus says, if you do not HONOUR HIM IN THE SAME WAY AS THE FATHER, You DISHONOUR THE FATHER TOO. You CANNOT honour the Father as GOD and Honour the Son as a Prophet. Muslims Blaspheme Jesus by dishonouring him and hence is also considered as DISHONOURING THE FATHER.

That all men should honour the Son, even as they honour the Father. He that honoureth not the Son honoureth not the Father which hath sent him.

John 5:23

John explicitly says that The LIAR who has the Spirit of AntiChrist Denies the Son. (1 John 2:22-23)

22 Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son.23 Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father: he that acknowledgeth the Son hath the Father also.

Conclusion

Christians understand the predicament of Muslims. They know that their Prophet cannot be marketed among people with some common sense. Therefore, they have to latch on to the Lord Jesus Christ and connect Muhammad somehow to get any leverage. In the process, Muslims Blaspheme Jesus, the Son of God. We will continue this series showcasing the ultimate insult to Jesus by denying his Divinity.

End of “The Ultimate insult to Jesus by denying his Divinity 1“

The Unitarian Muslim always tries to insert an Islamic square peg into a round hole. So let us cut the clutter of the Islamic conundrum of the Biblical Trinity. In the process, we will cut away the edges which are the cause for their deviated thought thereby forcing God into their box.

The ignorant among the Muslims will shout and tell that the word “TRINITY” is not there in the Bible or 1+1+1=1 is not logical for them etc. Sadly such people are the ones who miss out on logical thinking. They have pawned their brains to Allah and Muhammad. Hence the thinking capacity is lost. They do not understand that the Terminology of TRINITY is a human word for expressing the Concept we see throughout the Christian Scriptures. Without using the word TRINITY, we will spend much time explaining our beliefs, just as I am writing this article.

Knowing God

The Bible says that we would be able to understand the creator when we see the creation. Moreover, the invisible qualities of God can be seen through the creation.

For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.

Romans 1:20

The Story of the LEAF

By default, when I mention LEAF, you might possibly think of something like the one mentioned in the below picture.

But If I ask you to think a little more, you might be able to think of all the below ones as well. Surely you will realize that a leaf is not as simple as you thought. A Botany student would easily classify the one above as a SIMPLE LEAF. However, there are COMPOUND LEAVES too. Would you be able to identify the compound leaves from the ones shown below?

Let us consider the palm leaf. The palm leaf has one central midrib with multiple leaflets. Each leaflet has an individuality. However, the whole is A LEAF. We do not call it LEAVES in plural just because a Muslim considers each leaflet as a leaf. Similar is the Christian Concept of God. Each leaflet is equivalent to a person in the Trinity. We do not call the Trinity as GODS in the plural. All three form the BEING whom we call GOD. The Islamic concept is strictly UNITARIAN (Simple Leaf). As they have been forcing God into their box, the Christian TRINITARIAN (Compound Leaf) concept is unfathomable to them.

One God Three Persons

When we read the bible, just as in the case of the Compound Leaf, we get to know that there are 3 individuals in the same Godhead. Consider the below diagram of the LEAF as a representation.

Muslims who have lost the ability to comprehend the creation of nature needs to be constantly reminded of this picture. This has to be done repeatedly to show them what Christians believe. They may insist on their Unitarian ideology and fail to understand the Trinitarian concept. We need to keep patience and draw their attention to this leaf story. The Islamic square peg needs to be chipped off at the corners. It will take time for them to understand that the Christian doctrine of trinity is not 1+1+1=1 as they think.

Before Jesus Christ ascended to the Father, he commanded his disciples to baptize in that SINGLE NAME(YHWH) represented by the Three Persons of the Trinity.

Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the NAME of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, 

Matt 28:19

Notice the above scripture. The NAME is singular(It is not NAMES). However, the number of persons referred to in the sentence is Three(3) in total.

Conclusion

To assume and insist that God should redefine himself to fit into your box is a closed approach. Unfortunately, most Muslims I have encountered, have been schooled in a closed thinking environment. They quickly jump to their own conclusions and declare that the Christian Trinity is an illogical concept.

While discussing the Unitarian vs Trinitarian concept, we keep seeing definite proofs of the Triune God in both the Testaments(Old and New). Future articles of this series will deal with different aspects of this subject.

End of “Islamic conundrum of the Biblical Trinity 1“